About the Author
The Author
Andrew Heyman lives and works in Seattle Washington USA. His true vocation is political writing and agitating for the radical idea that a society that is governed by, and serves the needs of the people is best.
Andrew is also the member of a wonderful family with his loving wife, Pam, and the proud father of 2 wonderful children, Josie and Adam. They all keep him from becoming immersed in blogging to an unhealthy degree, and remind him of why he cares about what is going on in this world in the first place.
You can email him at kiacyclic-AT-gmail.com.
The "Intelligent Design" of Gary Randall's Plagiarism
In one recent posts on the Faith and Freedom Network blog, noted theocrat Gary Randall waxes sagely about the value of intelligent design theory:
The theory of Intelligent Design (ID) holds that certain features of the universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ID is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion.
Wow.
That is strikingly different from Randall's usual choppy and half-hazard sentence structure, and if you have read some of the posts about FFN and Gary Randall on Blackwhite it won't surprise you to learn that those aren't Randall's words at all.
That's right, I am taking time to once again shoot the proverbial fish in a barrel, and expose Randall for plagiarizing.
When we last exposed the dishonesty of FFN's gaping mouth piece, he was at least trying to cloak his plagiarism by rearranging some phrases and adding a few extra words. This time however, Gary has thrown caution to the winds and has returned to cutting pasting things directly, this time from the front page of the Intelligent Design Network's home website:
The theory of intelligent design (ID) holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ID is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion.
With the exception of the word "of" in the first sentence in between "and" "living" it is a direct cut a paste.
Which is why Randall's writing never evolves, but instead designed by someone else. . . Who he stole it from.